Prediction of Sjeng Schalken vs Cedric Pioline Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Schalken vs C. Pioline
Sjeng Schalken
NED
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
49
Age
56
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
11
Best Rank
118
9
Total Titles
6
0
YTD Titles
0
$32.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Cedric Pioline
FRA
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
49
Age
56
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
11
Best Rank
118
9
Total Titles
6
0
YTD Titles
0
$32.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Schalken 1 - 1 Pioline
They have played 5 sets in total, with Sjeng Schalken winning 2 and Cedric Pioline winning 3. The last match between Sjeng Schalken and Cedric Pioline was at the Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington D.C., 13-08-2002, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Sjeng Schalken getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schalken | 1 |
| Pioline | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington D.C.(08-13-02)
Sjeng Schalken
7
6
Cedric Pioline
6
1
(R1) U.S. Open(08-28-95)
Cedric Pioline
6
7
6
Sjeng Schalken
4
5
1
S. Schalken vs C. Pioline H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $32,510 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.60% (304-274) | Career Total W/L | 55.25% (400-324) |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 10 | Titles | 5 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Schalken vs C. Pioline Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sjeng Schalken has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cedric Pioline has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sjeng Schalken, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cedric Pioline has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sjeng Schalken has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cedric Pioline has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sjeng Schalken has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cedric Pioline winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sjeng Schalken has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 47/31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 70/75). Cedric Pioline has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 36/23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 107/98).
- Player level: In the last year, Sjeng Schalken has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cedric Pioline has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sjeng Schalken winning 1 times and Cedric Pioline being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Sjeng Schalken winning 2 and Cedric Pioline winning 3.
- The last match between Sjeng Schalken and Cedric Pioline was at the Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington D.C., 13-08-2002, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Sjeng Schalken getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sjeng Schalken has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cedric Pioline has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sjeng Schalken has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cedric Pioline has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sjeng Schalken has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cedric Pioline has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Sjeng Schalken vs Cedric Pioline Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Schalken vs C. Pioline H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 23 | Games Won | 26 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Schalken 0%, Pioline 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Schalken 0%, Pioline 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Schalken 0%, Pioline 0%.
S. Schalken Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Internazionali di Tennis - Bergamo - 06-02-2006 | ||||
SF  Simone BolelliS. Bolelli | L | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | ||
QF Davide SanguinettiD. Sanguinetti | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 Jean-Christophe FaurelJ. Faurel | W | 7-5 7-6(6) | ||
R1  Tobias SummererT. Summerer | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| The Natrel's Challenger of Granby - Granby - 25-07-2005 | ||||
R1  John-Paul FrutteroJ. Fruttero | L | 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5 | ||
C. Pioline Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davidoff Swiss Indoors - Basel - 21-10-2002 | ||||
R1  Tim HenmanT. Henman | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q3 Martin VerkerkM. Verkerk | W | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | ||
Q1  Jiri VanekJ. Vanek | W | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q2  Gaston EtlisG. Etlis | W | 2-6 6-0 7-5 | ||
| Grand Prix de Tennis de Lyon - Lyon - 07-10-2002 | ||||
R1 Sebastien GrosjeanS. Grosjean | L | 6-1 5-7 6-1 | ||
S. Schalken vs C. Pioline Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.60% (304/274) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.25% (400/324) |
| 52.32% (788/718) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.45% (1047/876) |
| 50.89% (7395/7136) | Games Win/Loss | 51.42% (9716/9178) |
| 52.63% (120/108) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.20% (107/98) |
| 48.28% (70/75) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.46% (122/102) |
| 52.76% (67/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.53% (126/93) |
| 60.26% (47/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 59.21% (45/31) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 97 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 69 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 406.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 285.39 |
| 71% (1804/2530) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 69% (1247/1804) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (400/726) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (116/251) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (1017/2576) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.47% (48/37) | Slam W/L | 61.29% (76/48) |
| 42.50% (51/69) | Masters W/L | 51.35% (76/72) |
| 53.85% (14/12) | Cups W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 54.38% (180/151) | Main Tour W/L | 55.31% (224/181) |
| 68.75% (11/5) | Challenger W/L | 57.69% (15/11) |
| 52% (245/468) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (311/578) |
| 56% (59/106) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 61% (85/139) |
| 49% (105/214) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (155/285) |
| 50% (98/196) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (129/264) |
| 80% (312/249) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (382/319) |
| 20% (312/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (382/61) |
| 20% (266/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (342/79) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:00 AM 15/11/25
PredictionH. Inoue3
K. NovakqW1
1.21
W2
3.9
02:30 AM 15/11/25
PredictionD. BlanchS. KozlovW1
1.666
W2
2.05
11:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction
R. M. Papoe
A. Chepelev3W1
1.57
W2
2.24
02:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction
O. Pieczkowski5
I. M. CurbeloW1
1.363
W2
2.86
02:30 PM 15/11/25
PredictionR. Molleker5A. Gray4W1
2.22
W2
1.58
05:00 AM 15/11/25
PredictionA. Weber1K. Filar7W1
1.2
W2
4
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Jannik Sinner
Alex De Minaur16:05
H2H 12-0
Carlos Taberner
Tomas Barrios Vera02:35
H2H 0-1
Alex BoltDane Sweeny07:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal