Prediction of Sjeng Schalken vs Cedric Pioline Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Schalken vs C. Pioline

Sjeng Schalken

NED

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'4" (193 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

118

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$32.5K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Cedric Pioline

FRA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'4" (193 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

118

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$32.5K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Schalken 1 - 1 Pioline

They have played 5 sets in total, with Sjeng Schalken winning 2 and Cedric Pioline winning 3. The last match between Sjeng Schalken and Cedric Pioline was at the Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington D.C., 13-08-2002, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Sjeng Schalken getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Schalken	1
Pioline	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington D.C.(08-13-02)

Stats

Sjeng Schalken

Cedric Pioline

(R1) U.S. Open(08-28-95)

Stats

Cedric Pioline

Sjeng Schalken

S. Schalken vs C. Pioline H2H Profile

S. Schalken	Stats	C. Pioline
$32,510	Career Prize Money	$0
52.60% (304-274)	Career Total W/L	55.25% (400-324)
1	Hard	1
10	Titles	5
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Schalken vs C. Pioline Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sjeng Schalken has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cedric Pioline has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sjeng Schalken, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cedric Pioline has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Sjeng Schalken has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cedric Pioline has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Sjeng Schalken has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cedric Pioline winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Sjeng Schalken has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 47/31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 70/75). Cedric Pioline has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 36/23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 107/98).
Player level: In the last year, Sjeng Schalken has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cedric Pioline has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sjeng Schalken winning 1 times and Cedric Pioline being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Sjeng Schalken winning 2 and Cedric Pioline winning 3.
The last match between Sjeng Schalken and Cedric Pioline was at the Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington D.C., 13-08-2002, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Sjeng Schalken getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sjeng Schalken has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cedric Pioline has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sjeng Schalken has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cedric Pioline has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Sjeng Schalken has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cedric Pioline has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sjeng Schalken vs Cedric Pioline Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Schalken vs C. Pioline H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Schalken	Stats	C. Pioline
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	3
23	Games Won	26
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Schalken Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Internazionali di Tennis - Bergamo - 06-02-2006
SF Simone BolelliS. Bolelli	L	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
QF Davide SanguinettiD. Sanguinetti	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
R2 Jean-Christophe FaurelJ. Faurel	W	7-5 7-6(6)	Stats
R1 Tobias SummererT. Summerer	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
The Natrel's Challenger of Granby - Granby - 25-07-2005
R1 John-Paul FrutteroJ. Fruttero	L	6-7(3) 6-2 7-5	Stats

View All

C. Pioline Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Davidoff Swiss Indoors - Basel - 21-10-2002
R1 Tim HenmanT. Henman	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Q3 Martin VerkerkM. Verkerk	W	6-1 3-6 6-1	Stats
Q2 Gaston EtlisG. Etlis	W	2-6 6-0 7-5	Stats
Q1 Jiri VanekJ. Vanek	W	4-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Grand Prix de Tennis de Lyon - Lyon - 07-10-2002
R1 Sebastien GrosjeanS. Grosjean	L	6-1 5-7 6-1	Stats

View All

S. Schalken vs C. Pioline Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Schalken	Stats	C. Pioline
52.60% (304/274)	YTD Win/Loss	55.25% (400/324)
52.32% (788/718)	Sets Win/Loss	54.45% (1047/876)
50.89% (7395/7136)	Games Win/Loss	51.42% (9716/9178)
52.63% (120/108)	Hard Win/Loss	52.20% (107/98)
48.28% (70/75)	Clay Win/Loss	54.46% (122/102)
52.76% (67/60)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.53% (126/93)
60.26% (47/31)	Grass Win/Loss	59.21% (45/31)
0.01	Aces Per Game	0
97	Aces Total	0
0.01	Double Faults Per Game	0
69	Total Double Faults	0
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
406.43	Average Opponent Rank	285.39
71% (1804/2530)	1st Serve %	0% (0/0)
69% (1247/1804)	1st Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
55% (400/726)	2nd Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
46% (116/251)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/0)
39% (1017/2576)	Return Points Win %	0% (0/0)
56.47% (48/37)	Slam W/L	61.29% (76/48)
42.50% (51/69)	Masters W/L	51.35% (76/72)
53.85% (14/12)	Cups W/L	53.33% (8/7)
54.38% (180/151)	Main Tour W/L	55.31% (224/181)
68.75% (11/5)	Challenger W/L	57.69% (15/11)
52% (245/468)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (311/578)
56% (59/106)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	61% (85/139)
49% (105/214)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	54% (155/285)
50% (98/196)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (129/264)
80% (312/249)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (382/319)
20% (312/61)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (382/61)
20% (266/54)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (342/79)